Mr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, your press conference on this historic day, 8th of April, was a relentless attack on the entire civil society. You asked the oft repeated question that the corrupt are wont to ask, viz: " Who represents the civil society?"
You went on to ask whether it is two or 200 people who, when they assemble, represent civil society.
You questioned the common sense of the civil society.
You said that sloganeering does not lead to governance.
You taunted civil society with not understanding the difference between substance and procedure.
You called them obdurate and inflexible
And you went on and on. And on.
But let me ask you something first: Whom do you represent?
I think the civil society, howsoever defined, has a right to know.
Do you represent the people of the country?
I am aware that you are a member of the Rajya Sabha but it is a paradox that while being a member of Rajya Sabha, you do not represent the people of the country.
Let me explain.
Is it not true that you voluntarily chose to bunk Parliament on 27th of August 2010, when the Rajya Sabha was in session, in order to argue a case before the Chief Justice of Karnataka?
I am an eyewitness because I was in Court that day. The Chief Justice of Karnataka is also a witness. He also agreed to hear your case on Saturday, a holiday.
And what was the fee? Reportedly rupees one crore. One does not know what component of that one crore was in cheque and how much was in cash, but let me not dwell on rumours.
Let me stick to facts.
How much would you have got by attending Parliament? An additional allowance of Rs1000?
Do you consider it an act of honesty?
To refuse to represent the people because you would only get Rs1000/- and not the reported figure of one crore (or whatever amount, do correct me) that you earned?
More important whom were you representing and who was paying you the reported obscene fees?
None other than Vedanta group which owns Sesa Goa. The dominant shareholder of the company is one Mr Anil Agarwal who is the very symbol of crony capitalism, having cornered the mineral wealth of the country worth lakhs of crores belonging to the people of the country.
That Mr Chidambaram was on his Board may be some consolation to you..
The iron ore mines of Sesa Goa are worth Rs 1.75 lakh crores. Hindustan Zinc, acquired for Rs 400 crores, has a profit of 5000 crores per annum and the bauxite mines of BALCO are worth lakhs of crores.
I accuse people like you for being responsible for this crony capitalism as being ever eager to betray the people and change sides for a crore or two — or whatever obscene amount you charge.
Is that your price as a so called representative of the people?
Yes Mr Singhvi, you chose —and choose —to represent the foremost crony capitalist of the country and not the people of the country.
You cannot win a single election — which is why you are in Rajya Sabha and not the Lok Sabha — where people of India vote directly, but have lost lakhs of votes with your diatribe against civil society.
People of the country pay you good money as monthly salary, allowances and life long pension. But your greed for money seems to be insatiable
Even a non- literate person having common sense will understand that a person drawing salary cannot undertake alternate employment while being on official duty.
As for your question as to who and how many people or factions represent civil society, let me remind you that it is the same question that the British asked of one Mahatma Gandhi. It was answered then and it is being answered now.
In spite of your bifocals why are you so wilfully blind —or stupid? — so as to not see the overwhelming support enjoyed by this national anti- corruption movement for which you and your party are responsible?
Please do not try and divide the civil society. You may be able to speak English but please do not behave like the British!
There are many who, even though they do not speak English, know what Divide and Rule is.
Your leader Sonia Gandhi understands the power of civil society because she has to fight an election. It is for this reason that she has directed you all to put up and shut up.
As for democracy , Parliament and procedure : Do you want to have a referendum on corruption and the Jan Lokpal bill?
For the record, a complaint has been filed against you with the Chairman of the Ethics Committee for violation of various clauses of code of conduct, in particular clause 4 which states:
(iv)Members should always see that their private financial interests and those of the members of their immediate family do not come in conflict with the public interest and if any such conflict ever arises, they should try to resolve such a conflict in a manner that the public interest is not jeopardised.
Did you violate this provision on 27/8/2010?
You need not be a member of the House to answer the question. Ask any member of the civil society and he will tell you.
Mr Singhvi you would do well to stop abusing the civil society. If you do not, it will teach you the lesson of your life.
Like Mr Sibal learnt the other night.
A.K. Agrawal is the author of Reliance, the Real Natwar
AUTHORS: A.K. AGRAWAL
TAGS: LOKAYUKTA & LOKPAL | PROTESTS | CORRUPTION | DEMOCRACY | CONGRESS |PARLIAMENT
SECTION: NATIONAL
SUBSECTION: OPINION
APR 09, 2011 08:13 PM 25 | A brilliant article by A K Agrawal ,justifiably slamming Abhishek Manu Singhvi for his irresponsible and immature remarks about Anna Hazare and civil society.This loud mouth can stoop to any level to please his mentor Sonia Gandhi. In fact, all spokespersons of the Congress party are remote-controlled cronies of the de facto and extra-constitutional authority viz Chairperson of the NAC which is nothing but a cluster of arm- chair, elitist, self-styled members of civil society who have no clue to the ground realities.The NAC is like an NGO getting undeservedly handsome salaries and perks including rent-free bungalows,security,transports etc.All powers but without an iota of accountability and responsibility.Worse, all these freebies are at the cost of tax-payers money.The Constitution does not permit all this extravaganza. The present political Executive of India is functioning in an elected monarchy rather than a functioning democracy. A K SAXENA (A retired civil servant) |
APR 09, 2011 08:03 PM 24 | One of the features of the Indian political scene is these Rs. 500000/ appearance ( or is it one crore a day? ) corporate law years who earned their spurs in law courts. As a rule these set of people has no connect with mainstream India. Living in their own cocoon earning millions by talking askew gobbledegook in front judges these smart aleks are courted by political parties , nobody knows why.Their only admires are high midlle class India which is to say no India. This genre who become politicians inside the clostrophobic confines of TV studios cofuses smart talking with natioanl service. They confuse narrow corporate interest with national interest. Poor Abhshek Manu Singhvi! He was thrown to the battle to defend the indefensible. His background do not prepare him for understanding what he is talking about. No wonder his labours brought PR disaster for his party. Dr. Singhvi can take consolation from the fact that he is not alone in the business. He has good comapny across the poitical spectrum. |
APR 09, 2011 07:22 PM 23 | My answer to Singhvi and his ilk is, "We represent ourselves - the ordinary people of India, on who his party swears - the aam aadmi". We have a right to ask our representatives, what they are doing and ask them to do what we would want them to do. When you and I and others differ in what we ask them, they are free to do and tell us, whose views they have accepted and why. The author of the article rightly asks Singhvi, "Whom does he represent, in Parliament and outside?" Ask yourselves, "Whom do everyone of our MPs and MLAs represent? - especially, the ones like, Singhvi and the AP MP seen on TV [Times Now] punching his assistant and telling lies afterwords". Not only did this 'elected representative' tell a blatant lie, he said it in English, a language, which he evidently does not know. Why not speak in any Indian language, with which he is familiar? Regards, Mathew Thomas |
APR 09, 2011 07:00 PM 22 |
I agree with you on this pont and have written elsewhere,
However, to tar and feather Singhvi for articulating the Congress position is unfair. It amounts to kicking the dog because you don't like its master. |
APR 09, 2011 06:43 PM 21 | When Anna Hazare started the movement at Jantar Mantar Abhisek Manu Singhvi branded it as RSS sponsored and crticised it.The way he talked it was seen that he is quite slavisn to the boss.He told the media that how can a private person be given so much powers or dictate terms t the govt.But he forget that Sonia Gandhi is not a cabinet minister nor any official poistion but ass the chairperson of her Part he adorned the NAC, the highest decision making body of Indian Govt.Is she not an extra constitutionla authority.His argumenst are totally uncalled for and appears hollow.He is one crook who earns billions by way of protecting all corrupts industrialists as a broker.He mus apolgise to nation for his remarks on Ann Hazare after 4th April 2011.Now his masters have accepted all the demands put forth by Revered Anna Hazare and he should be ashamed of his vitriolitic attacks on him. |
So 83 hours later, the government finally gave in. It was not the usually smug and self-satisfied —but a visibly crestfallen —Kapil Sibal that announced the government's decision that the UPA had ostensibly agreed to all of Mr Anna Hazare's demands and that a "government order" constituting the 10-member joint committee would be issued tomorrow. It need not have been so graceless to start with, persisting right through Day 4 with, among others, Mr Abhisekh Manu Singhvi's histrionics. Given the mass-scale revulsion against recent, seemingly non-stop series of scams, there was an air of inevitability about it and the UPA had not done its cause any good by announcing its absurd Lokpal Bill. The attempt to spin today's decision, on the fourth day, as some sort of magnanimity on the part of the UPA chairperson or the PM is nothing but typical craven behaviour ingrained in Congress culture. Mr Kapil 'Zero Loss on 2G Spectrum Allocation' Sibal's with no sense of irony also added for good measure: "We are on the same page with civil society in fighting the scourge of corruption. Both sides have confidence in each other." On the part of the protesters, Mr Shanti Bhushan, who has been announced as a co-chairperson of the committee to draft the new—revised, and hopefully improved —Bill, has already announced this as the biggest victory for people power after 1977, and declared that the celebrations should begin across the country. Yes, this is cause for cheer. But just one cheer—not even for two, leave alone three. The proof of the pudding, as they say, would be in the eating. The activists on the panel — Anna Hazare, Shanti Bhushan, Prashant Bhushan, Arvind Kejriwal and Santosh Hegde —would of course know that they are dealing with past masters of obfuscation —Pranab Mukherjee (chairman), P. Chidambaram, Veerappa Moily, Salman Khurshid and Kapil Sibal — and that the government's decision of an order, which can be withdrawn, as against a gazetted notification, may well only be a tactical ploy to buy time. The UPA as usual would soon be back to its blatant, brazen ways, claiming that they have done exactly what the people wanted on corruption and that they need to be complimented, hoping that all their scams would be forgotten. Just the way various party and government spokespeople seek to spin the arrest of Mr Raja by the CBI acting under the SC as UPA's great favour to India. Even the most perfect bill — which of course yet remains a very distant dream — by itself will not be able to solve the pervasive and corrosive corruption that we are surrounded by. Let's remember that strengthening of autonomous and independent institutions remains a long way off. Yes, perhaps it is time to acknowledge that a first, small, significant step has been taken in the war against corruption. But let's retain perspective: this was just one small, symbolic battle. A full-scale, hostile war looms ahead. So all one can hope for is that the newly set-up committee is able to get down to drafting a serious bill with teeth that would not suffer from the various infirmities and absurdities clearly visible in various Jan Lokpal drafts. So much for the dark clouds. Now on to the big silver lining. There are many reasons to smile as well. Despite the known, credible face of Mr Hazare, which was the rallying point, the movement was youth-driven. For all those perpetually moaning and groaning about the apolitical and apathetic youth, the outpouring on the streets should have been a big silver lining. And that it was totally non-violent. Various opportunists and usual suspects and busybodies tried, but were largely kept away — the movement remained largely non-political. And it seemed to have been perfectly timed too. After the world cup and just before the IPL madness. It would be a shame to let all this positive energy that defeated the cynicism of the naysayers is not dissipated, and the danger of that initiative being taken away from civil society is very real as an old master at the art of fobbing off have been appointed to head the committee Let's remember that this one succeeded only because the revulsion against corruption was so pervasive —almost as pervasive as corruption itself. Who represents the people and who speaks for the so-called "civil society" are all good questions to engage with. But let's remember that (a) no body has stopped others from stepping forward to participate and (b) in the end, it would still be Parliament where the bills would be passed. Yet, it might give ideas to many disruptive and dissenting groups to adopt similar measures for various demands. With the snows melting, it could well prove to be a deluge. It promises to be one long, hot summer... The government will have its job cut out. *** BTW, have a lot to say on much of the —some of it very valid, but mostly simply missing the point — criticism of the Jan Lokpal Bill and the hurried "work in progressFAQ" that has remained neglected after the first day. For now, let me just add a few tweets from yesterday in response to the campaign against the protests at Jantar Mantar:
TRANSLATE INTO:
RELATED WIRES : Syrian Activists Call for Daily Protests APR 09, 2011 Anna Fast Not the Right Way: NCP APR 09, 2011 Congress Welcomes Hazare Ending Fast APR 09, 2011 GPCC Demands Appointment of Lokayukta in Gujarat APR 09, 2011 Omar Amused by the People in Hazare's Bandwagon APR 09, 2011 Swamy Welcomes Hazare's Decision to End Fast APR 09, 2011 Murthy Hails Lokpal Developments APR 09, 2011 |
PHOTOSWIRESBLOGSLATEST |