---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Romi Elnagar <bluesapphire48@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:26 PM
Subject: [bangla-vision] The Massacre of the Afghan 17 and the Obama Cover-Up
To:
                                                  
 
![]()
![]() 
	                              
 
From: Romi Elnagar <bluesapphire48@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:26 PM
Subject: [bangla-vision] The Massacre of the Afghan 17 and the Obama Cover-Up
To:
The Massacre of the Afghan 17 and the Obama Cover-Up
The March 11 Massacre of the 17 Afghan citizens,  including at least nine children and four women, raises many fundamental  issues about the nature of a colonial war, the practices of a colonial  army engaged in a prolonged (eleven-year) occupation and the character  of an imperial state as it commits war crimes and increasingly relies on  arbitrary dictatorial measures to secure public compliance and suppress  dissent.
 After  the cold-blooded murder of the 17 Afghan villagers in Kandahar Province  the US military and the ever-complicit Obama regime constructed an  elaborate cover-up, exposing the Administration up to charges of  conspiracy to suppress the essential facts, falsify data and obstruct  justice: All are grounds for criminal prosecution and impeachment.
 	 This massacre is just one of several hundred committed by US armed  forces according to the Afghan president, Hamid Karzai. It could ruin  the Obama presidency, by putting him on trial for conspiracy to obstruct  justice and arguably send him to jail for war crimes.
 	 Obama's deliberate lies about the events surrounding the  massacre and the fundamental responsibility of the high military command  for the crimes committed by its troops underscores the breakdown of the  occupation of Afghanistan, the very centerpiece of Obama's war policy.  The President of the United States has personally played a major role in the cover-up.  From a political vantage point, the executive conspiracy charge has  wider and deeper implications than the massacre itself, as horrible as  it is.
 	The Massacre, the 'Official' Story (1st version) and the Cover-Up
 	According to the US military command in Afghanistan and the Obama regime, at 3am on March 11, 2012 a deranged soldier  walked off a Special Forces Base in rural Kandahar Province and without  command authority entered two villages (two miles apart), shot and  killed 17 unarmed civilians, mostly women and children and wounded an  unspecified number of villagers; then he doused their bodies with  gasoline, set them on fire and hiked back to base to surrender himself  to his commanders. This 'surrender', the Pentagon claims, was recorded  on video and no less than the President of the United States, Barack  Obama, vouched for its authenticity as conclusive proof for the story of  a lone, unbalanced mass murderer. The military command quickly whisked  the initially unnamed murderer out of the Afghanistan to the maximum  security federal prison in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas and only then  identified the madman as a 38-year old, multi-decorated, 11-year army  veteran, Staff Sgt. Robert Bales. The US has rejected all attempts by  the Afghan President, the Afghan Army Chief and members of the Afghan  Parliament to interview Sgt Bales, gather testimony and bring the  suspect to trial in Afghanistan.
 	 According to an independent Afghan parliamentary investigation led  by Sayed Ishaq Gillami, and initial investigations by General Sher  Mohammed Karimi of the Afghan Army, who interviewed residents of the two  villages, there are significant contradictions in the US military's and  President Obama's "official story". Eye witnesses have testified that  up to 20 soldiers were involved, aided by a helicopter. What they  described was typical of a US Special Forces' night time raid, which  involved the systematic breaking down of doors, rousing the sleeping  families and shooting Afghan victims.
 	 Gordon Duff, senior editor of Veterans Today, finds the  villagers' version of events quite plausible for the following reasons:  The villages, where the murders occurred, were two miles apart, making  it highly unlikely that a lone, fully armed solder could haul a  multi-gallon jerry can of gasoline from his base to the first sleeping  village, break down the doors of one or more homes, commit the murders,  douse and burn his victims and then proceed on foot two miles further on  to the second village, shoot, kill and burn the next set of unarmed  villagers and then walk back to his base and surrender. 
 	 It makes far more sense that a heavily armed group of Special  Forces troops, engaged in village 'pacification' operations, left their  base in military vehicles, passed through the gate in the wee hours of the morning, on a routine official operation, authorized by the bases military command  and something went wrong. What was supposed to have been a typical  midnight assault on a "pacified" village in search of Taliban  supporters, turned into the mass murder of children and their mothers in  bed with virtually no adult males (husbands, fathers, uncles or  brothers) present to protect them. Typically, all Afghan farmers keep  weapons in their homes, but these villages had been disarmed by the  Special Forces and the adult men had either been detained in earlier  sweeps or were in hiding from just such brutal operations in the  expectation that their wives and children would not be attacked. 
 	 Whatever triggered the mass murder of mothers and children in their  nightclothes in those villages in Kandahar, one thing is clear: the  President of the United States conspired with the US military command to obstruct justice in the cover-up of a heinous war crime, a felony punishable with impeachment.
 	 When the implausibility first 'official' story became  embarrassingly evident to the most superficial observer, the Obama  'cover-up' crew released a new version on March 26: According to the  revised version of events, the lone, deranged Sgt. Bales committed the  first massacre in the early morning hours of March 11, walked back to  base for breakfast and lunch and then walked out again to a second  village for another round of mass murder – before returning and turning  himself in to his commander posing for the video.
 	Why the Obama Cover-Up: Military Demoralization and the Iran War
 	 Why would President Obama engage in such a clumsy cover-up further  eroding US relations with the Afghan President Karzai, the Afghan  military and especially the Afghan people? Why would he risk charges of  conspiracy to protect war criminals by insisting on an easily refutable  cover-up?
 	 The story of the alleged assassin, Staff Sgt. Robert Bales,  provides some leads about the larger crisis facing the imperial  military. Bales is a 'decorated' soldier rewarded for his three tours of  combat duty in Iraq and his more recent Afghan assignment where he  would have participated in similar types of Special Pacification Operations  among civilians in the countryside in Afghanistan. In the days after  news of the massacre leaked out, a furious Afghan President Karzai  claimed that "hundreds" of similar massacres had been perpetrated by US  and NATO forces and had gone unreported in the Western media and  unpunished. Karzai has repeatedly called for an end to US Special  Forces' night raids on sleeping villages. But, until now, there had been  no need for a US Presidential cover-up up. With the approaching US  withdrawal from Afghanistan and the growing expressions of militant  Afghan nationalism, the Obama regime must hide the true nature of the  occupation. Washington's Afghan clients can no longer ignore US war  crimes against innocent children and women and other non-combatants.  This is especially true in the so-called 'pacified' villages where the  adult Afghani men have already been arrested in sweeps or driven into  hiding and with the few remaining, disarmed and 'under the control' of  the US Special Forces.
 	 Considering even the US official story, why would the Special  Forces commanders in charge of the Sgt. Bales base ignore the loud  bursts of gunfire and screams of women and children in a village within  100 meters of its perimeter at 3 am? According to their official  version, the base command only became aware of the massacres when Sgt.  Bales walked back to base, raised his hands high for a video-op and  confessed to killing and desecrating the bodies of 17, mostly children  and women. 
 	Obama has tried to sell the 'confession' video as proof of the  'official version' of events to a skeptical Afghan President Karzai who  contemptuously demanded the 'alleged' video be turned over for a  detailed examination for authenticity. Obama's refusal to release the  video tends to confirm his role in the cover-up. 
 	Obama's contention that a 'lone unbalanced gunman' committed the  crime is completely self-serving and exposes serious and deep structural  problems with the war in Afghanistan. US combat troops in Afghanistan  are demoralized and angry because their military commanders have marched  them into a cul de sac – a dead end. They are engaged in a long, losing  war where every dead US soldier is accompanied by scores who are  maimed, blinded and mentally traumatized. In Obama's war, the wounded  are patched up and recycled back into the same meat grinder in an  increasingly hostile environment, where rape, torture, maiming and  murder become their only 'recreation'. Sgt. Bales was coerced into  multiple tours of duty in Iraq and then shipped off to Afghanistan, contrary to his expectations of a promotion and an end to overseas combat assignments.
 	 There is a huge gap between the world of the political  warlords in Washington and their accomplices among the warmongering  'lobbies' and that of the soldiers who risk their lives in imperial wars  of occupation. These dispensable soldiers are repeatedly deployed to  brutal colonial wars thousands of miles from their homes to confront an  'enemy' they cannot possibly understand. They end up brutalizing the  families, friends, neighbors and compatriots of the elusive Afghan  anti-colonial fighters – who are everywhere. Back in the Washington  none of the political war-mongers ever experience the pain and  suffering of a prolonged war, which for any soldier on the battlefield,  is ever present, everywhere. Soldiers, like Sgt. Bales, operate in a  very hostile environment where, a roadside bomb or a grenade thrown from  a motorcycle, or even a 'trusted' Afghan ally, who might turn his gun  on his US 'mentors,' are omnipresent threats to their ever returning  home in one piece. 
 	Obama has to conspire with the Pentagon in covering up this mass  murder, defending the officers in charge of these 'pacified' villages,  because there are no alternatives, no back-ups, no new recruits eager to  engage in the 12th year of war in Afghanistan. There are only the  re-cycled killers, willing to pursue their career in 'Special Forces'  involving 'kill and destroy' operations. Furthermore, Obama cannot rely  on the international allies who are rushing to withdraw their own troops  from this quagmire. And Obama has a problem with his allied Afghan  warlords and kleptocrats, who managed to run off with over $4.5 billion  dollars in 2011 (half of the entire state budget) (Financial Times,  3/19/12, p. 1). President Obama cannot allow an entire garrison,  including their commanding officer to be put on trial for the war crimes  in this massacre. Holding anyone, besides the hapless Sgt. Bales,  accountable for the massacre would incite a general rebellion within the  armed forces, or, at a minimum, further demoralize the elite Special  Forces who are expected to man these long-term engagements after the  regulars withdraw, which in the case of Afghanistan could last until  2024.
 	 This issue has implications far beyond Afghanistan: Obama has  developed his entire new counter-insurgency strategy centered on the easy entry and bloody exits  of US Special Forces targeting over seventy-five countries. The Special  Forces figure prominently in Obama's military preparations for Syria  and Iran, which have been developed at the behest of his Zionist  overlords.
 	 In the final analysis, the entire imperial military apparatus of  the Obama regime, while formidable on paper, depends on the 'Special  Operations' formations. As such, they are the centerpiece of the new  imperial warfare, developed as a response to the demands for reduced  ground forces, budgetary constraints and growing domestic discontent.  Their 'actions' are designed to leave no witnesses and no  embarrassments. They may be the butchers of children, women and unarmed  civilians but they are the White House's butchers. 
 	 Despite all their crimes and cover-ups, the Obama regime's priority is to defend the empire with whatever personnel is available at his disposal.  So while Sgt. Bales is in Leavenworth, the Afghan elite cry injustice,  the families in Kandahar mourn their dead and the Taliban plan their  revenge.
 	 On the domestic front, Obama faces strong popular opposition to the  costly unending wars, which have destroyed the US economy, and growing  anger and demoralization in the armed forces. As a result of the massive  popular discontent among the American people with politicians of both  parties who have recklessly sent troops into anachronistic colonial  wars, which serve the interest of foreign powers, the President has  issued an executive decree, allowing him to assume dictatorial powers in order to militarize the entire economy, its resources and its work force. On March 16, 2012 Barak Obama issued an Executive Order-National Defense Resource Preparedness in order to sustain the global empire.
  	 Clearly prolonged colonial wars cannot be sustained through the consent of  the citizens and such wars cannot be prosecuted according to military  manuals and the Geneva Conventions. At this point, only Presidential 'rule by decree'  can secure compliance of the citizens at home and only massacres and  cover-ups can sustain the colonial occupations abroad. But these are  desperate and temporary: When the extreme measures have run their course  there will be nothing to fall back on and nothing can save the  president of a collapsing empire from the revolt of its citizens and soldiers. 
 __._,_.___
                       
 
No comments:
Post a Comment